Navigating Monogamy in a Sea of Poly

topic posted Thu, March 5, 2009 - 6:13 PM by  Michael
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
It gives me great pleasure to write this here since this is perhaps my favorite Tribe forum. I have the honor of presenting a class on behalf of the Society of Janus. The class is about being monogamous in the scene and I will be discussing how both singles and couples can deal with the issues around that choice. I think it will make for a lively discussion and a learning experience for both myself and those in attendance. If you are from here and you choose to attend, please come up and say hi and let me know that you are part of this tribe!

Michael

For those who want it, the full description, details and my bio is added below:

Thursday, March 26th at SF Citadel
8:00pm - 10:00pm (Doors open at 7:30pm)
$5/Janus members and affiliates; $15/non-members (you do not need to be a member to attend!)
Navigating Monogamy in a Sea of Poly
Is monogamy is a valid choice for people who can, and do possess the capacity and desire for a committed relationship? For the single person, we cover strategies for becoming known and developing a good reputation, even if you don't play casually. For couples, we will discuss ways for couples to preserve and enhance their relationship despite the ever present poly pressure. Lastly, we will discuss strategies for how to say “No” politely, but more importantly, how to convey your monogamous status to reduce unwanted cruising of you or your partner.
Presenter bio:
Michael is a largely monogamous dominant man and something of a private player who has been in and around the scene for well over a decade. He owned and ran Dragon’s Keep, one of the few N. California public play spaces outside of the bay area. Over a decade ago, he formed Sacramento's oldest and largest BDSM group, PleasureBound. The group is very dynamic and includes International Leather Title Holders, a nationally recognized leatherworker, and MAsT International leadership in its membership. He is also a co-director and occasional host of MAsT Sacramento Valley. Combining his passion for woodworking and BDSM, he created Torturewood.com and has supported a wide variety of leather title holders, community events, and groups with donations of time, money, and his art.
posted by:
Michael
Sacramento
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Navigating Monogamy in a Sea of Poly

    Sat, March 28, 2009 - 7:04 PM
    I posted this to my fetlife blog, but thought I'd add it here as well...
    ---
    I frequently take BDSM classes at the Citadel, and most blend into the background. But the class I attended last night was just excellent, and warrants its own blog post. The class was called Navigating Monogamy in a Sea of Poly and was taught by Michael Bush, who is apparently well known in the Sacramento BDSM community.

    I've learned that you can often tell how a class is going to be by who else is in the audience. Walking into the Citadel, I spotted Iain and Angela (proprietors of EduKink.com and accomplished BDSM educators themselves). Then I spotted Master Rick and slave Tina, two of my favorite people in the scene and also the 2008 Master/slave title holders. Aside from really liking Rick and Tina as people, they have a relationship that comes much closer to what I ultimately seek than most in the scene, so I was delighted to see them there.

    A few jokes were made about how if Janus (the sponsor) had been successful in their marketing and managed to get 100% of the people in the SF scene who identify with monogamy to show up, then perhaps all seven of us would be in attendance! But as it would turn out there were more than a dozen people there, and we reassured one another that there really is a monogamy-oriented component of the scene, even if we're in the minority. Rick shared a few entertaining stories about how people had actually accused him of "not being a real Master" if he was unwilling to order his slave to have sex with other men. The maturity and intellect of people in the scene never ceases to amaze me. (See previous blog post on that subject).

    I became something of a guinea pig, as Michael used my own circumstances to exemplify many of the points he made during his lecture. I quite appreciated the personalization, and didn't mind being singled out at all.

    I think the biggest learning for me came after I said to the class, "You know, I feel like a complete weirdo in the scene, because I'm one of those old-fashioned types who really doesn't want to have sex with a girl without first at least taking her on a dinner date and getting to know her as a person!" Everyone laughed in recognition of the fact that my viewpoint is in the minority in our "community".

    But the real lesson for me came when I realized that I only felt comfortable saying that because I knew I was in the company of like-minded people. Several other people in the class made the observation that there are plenty of women who go to munches once or twice and get turned off by the poly vibe, then never go back. My past behavior of not being clear in a much setting that I'm non-poly was motivated by the knowledge that I was in the minority, and a misplaced desire to "fit in". Making my unusual taste clear at a munch so as to identify myself to others in that minority would have been a much better strategy. Note to self: Be clear, be myself, and be proud of it. Being perceived as "a typical member of the BDSM community" is very definitely NOT a goal of mine, so being shy about the fact that I don't relate to this scene the way most others do was clearly a mistake.

    It's ironic how things tend to work out... I was coming to this class from another event, and was wearing a sport jacket, slacks and nice shoes. I would normally never show up at the Citadel in such attire, for fear of looking like a complete outcast. Frankly, I just don't relate to "Leather attire", and don't own the big boots (to me they just look silly), leather vest, leather pants, and the rest of the "in the scene" uniform. So in the past when I go to the Citadel I've tried to come as close as I could by wearing my one pair of black boots (they're from Barney's, not Mr. S. Leather, but they're as close to the "leather look" as my wardrobe gets), black pants and a black shirt. In other words, I've tried to dress down from my usual attire to fit into the crowd as best I could.

    Ironically, for this particular class, logistics demanded that I be dressed like myself. Michael (the instructor) stopped me on the way out, and offered the advice that he thought the best thing I could do was dress for a play party as I was at the class. His point was that I would stick out like a sore thumb, and that this was desirable, since my relationship desires are also quite unusual in the scene, and being perceived as different is therefore desirable.

    Great food for thought. I generally avoid play parties (I'm a private play kind of guy), but I think that just for fun if I ever go to a play party again, I'll wear my black Armani sport coat, black Zenga slacks, black Gucci loafers and belt, and a black silk shirt. The all-black look is enough "scene" for me, and frankly sticking out like a sore thumb who doesn't fit into "the BDSM scene" is just fine with me. Besides, I enjoy dressing up in clothes that I think are dressy. It's the "Formal Leather" look that I just don't think I could bring myself to wear.

    Rick and Tina are teaching M/s relationship dynamics at the Citadel on 4/11. I'll definitely be attending that class too.

    Scott
    • Re: Navigating Monogamy in a Sea of Poly

      Sat, March 28, 2009 - 10:38 PM
      Thank you for posting that, Scott. I feel the same way you do on everything you mentioned. The munches up here in Portland are pro-poly too, but I am not poly. I have had to be vocal about that to the organizers saying that while the majority of the people who attend munches are poly, not everyone who attends is, so they shouldn't be promoting any kind of poly agenda. I also do not dress "leather". The closest I have dressed to "scene" is black gothic pirate. I don't understand the appeal for leather gear to try and say you are kinky. The same with rubber. I prefer dressing as a Goddess, for that is the energy I hold within me. So, I usually look pretty normal, maybe pagany if anything.

      I hope someday Michael can teach up here. I know he would be most welcome. The same with you, Scott. :)

      Blessings,
      Mama Gaea
    • Re: Navigating Monogamy in a Sea of Poly

      Sun, March 29, 2009 - 12:05 AM

      > Great food for thought. I generally avoid play parties (I'm a private play kind of guy), but I think that just for fun if I ever go to a play party again, I'll wear my black Armani sport coat, black Zenga slacks, black Gucci loafers and belt, and a black silk shirt.

      I think that outfit sounds very attractive!


      As for the polyamorous versus monogamous issue, what I have found is that everyone uses those words differently anyway. Some who say monogamous will do many things with others, but just not have penetrative sex, while others won't do anything with others, and everything in between. So I find the best thing to do is to ask what someone means when they tell me they're poly or mono. That gives me way more information.
    • Re: Navigating Monogamy in a Sea of Poly

      Thu, April 2, 2009 - 1:42 AM
      Scott, I agree with the advice you were given. Just be yourself, and you will shine for who you are rather than what you are wearing. Then, they will notice your fantastic threads.

      Cynthia
      (who has a love/hate affair with "fetish" clothing and entirely too many pairs of leggings)

Recent topics in "BDSM and Spirituality"